RNU (Foxn1RNU-Nude) Rats Demonstrate an Improved Ability to Regenerate Muscle in a Volumetric Muscle Injury Compared to Sprague Dawley Rats

McClure, Michael J. and Olson, Lucas C. and Cohen, David J. and Huang, Yen Chen and Zhang, Shirley and Nguyen, Tri and Boyan, Barbara D. and Schwartz, Zvi (2021) RNU (Foxn1RNU-Nude) Rats Demonstrate an Improved Ability to Regenerate Muscle in a Volumetric Muscle Injury Compared to Sprague Dawley Rats. Bioengineering, 8 (1). p. 12. ISSN 2306-5354

[thumbnail of bioengineering-08-00012.pdf] Text
bioengineering-08-00012.pdf - Published Version

Download (3MB)

Abstract

Products developed for skeletal muscle regeneration frequently incorporate allogeneic and xenogeneic materials to elicit a regenerative response to heal skeletal muscle wounds. To avoid graft rejection in preclinical studies, immunodeficient rodents are used. Whether the immunodeficiency alters the host response to the material in skeletal muscle has not been studied. In this study, we hypothesized that an allogeneic acellular skeletal muscle grafts implanted in an immunodeficient rat (RNU, Foxn1-deficient) would exhibit better new muscle fiber formation compared to grafts implanted in immunocompetent Sprague Dawley (SD) rats. Decellularized SD skeletal muscle matrix (DMM) was implanted in the gastrocnemius (N = 8 rats/group). 56 days after surgery, animal gait was examined and animals were euthanized. Muscle force was assessed and fiber number as well as immune cell infiltrate was measured by histomorphometry and immunohistochemistry. Animal gait and percent recovery of muscle force were unchanged in both groups, but newly regenerated muscle fibers increased in RNU rats. Macrophage staining for CD68 was higher in RNU rats than in SD rats. These data show differences in muscle regeneration between animal models using the same biomaterial treatment, but these differences could not be ascribed to the immune response. Overall, our data provide awareness that more studies are needed to understand how host responses to biomaterials differ based on the animal model used.

Item Type: Article
Subjects: Institute Archives > Engineering
Depositing User: Managing Editor
Date Deposited: 02 Jan 2023 10:29
Last Modified: 28 May 2024 04:36
URI: http://eprint.subtopublish.com/id/eprint/717

Actions (login required)

View Item
View Item