Patient and retina specialists’ preferences in neovascular age-related macular degeneration treatment. A discrete choice experiment

Gallego-Pinazo, Roberto and Pina-Marin, Begoña and Comellas, Marta and Aceituno, Susana and Gómez-Baldó, Laia and Blanch, Carles and Madigan, Michele (2021) Patient and retina specialists’ preferences in neovascular age-related macular degeneration treatment. A discrete choice experiment. PLOS ONE, 16 (12). e0261955. ISSN 1932-6203

[thumbnail of journal.pone.0261955.pdf] Text
journal.pone.0261955.pdf - Published Version

Download (828kB)

Abstract

Introduction and objective
Neovascular age-related macular degeneration (nAMD) leads to severe and permanent visual impairment, significantly impacting patients’ quality of life and functional independence. Although treatment with anti- vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) prevents and, in some cases, reverses visual damage, the need for frequent monitoring visits and intravitreal injections represents a significant burden on patients, caregivers and retina specialists.

Objective
To elicit preferences for nAMD treatment characteristics from the perspectives of patients and retina specialists.

Method
A discrete choice experiment was conducted. Participants (patients > 50 years with nAMD receiving anti-VEGF drugs for at least 2 years and without previous experience with anti-VEGF and retina specialists working in the Spanish National Healthcare System) were asked to select one of two hypothetical treatments resulting from the combination of five attributes (effects on visual function, effects on retinal fluid, treatment regimen, monitoring frequency, and cost); their levels were identified by reviewing the literature and two focus groups. The relative importance (RI) given to each attribute was estimated using a mixed logit model. The marginal rates of substitution (MRS) were calculated taking cost as the risk attribute.

Results
A total of 110 patients (P) [aged 79.0 (SD:7.4) years; 57.3% women; 2.3 (SD:0.7) years with nAMD; 2.1 years (SD:0.1) in treatment] and 66 retina specialists (RS) participated in the study. Participants gave greater RI to improvements in their visual function [60.0% (P); 52.7% (RS)], lower monitoring frequency [20.2% (P); 27.1% (RS)] and reduction in retinal fluid [9.8% (P); 13.0%(RS)]. Patients and retina specialists would agree to an increase in cost by 65.0% and 56.5%, respectively, in exchange for improvements of visual function; and 25.5% and 43.3% on delaying monitoring frequency by one month.

Conclusions
Efficacy of treatment, in terms of visual function improvements, is the main driver for treatment election for both patients and retina specialists. Treatment monitoring requirements are also considered, mainly from the retina specialist’s perspective. These results suggest that the use of more efficacious anti-VEGF agents with a longer duration of action may contribute to aligning treatment characteristics with patients/specialists’ preferences. A better alignment would facilitate better disease management, fulfilling the unmet needs of patients and retina specialists.

Item Type: Article
Subjects: Institute Archives > Medical Science
Depositing User: Managing Editor
Date Deposited: 09 Feb 2023 05:42
Last Modified: 01 Jul 2024 05:59
URI: http://eprint.subtopublish.com/id/eprint/724

Actions (login required)

View Item
View Item