Potential thresholds of critically increased cardiac-related spinal cord motion in degenerative cervical myelopathy

Pfender, Nikolai and Jutzeler, Catherine R. and Hubli, Michèle and Scheuren, Paulina S. and Pfyffer, Dario and Zipser, Carl M. and Rosner, Jan and Friedl, Susanne and Sutter, Reto and Spirig, José M. and Betz, Michael and Schubert, Martin and Seif, Maryam and Freund, Patrick and Farshad, Mazda and Curt, Armin and Hupp, Markus (2024) Potential thresholds of critically increased cardiac-related spinal cord motion in degenerative cervical myelopathy. Frontiers in Neurology, 15. ISSN 1664-2295

[thumbnail of fneur-15-1411182.pdf] Text
fneur-15-1411182.pdf - Published Version

Download (3MB)

Abstract

Introduction: New diagnostic techniques are a substantial research focus in degenerative cervical myelopathy (DCM). This cross-sectional study determined the significance of cardiac-related spinal cord motion and the extent of spinal stenosis as indicators of mechanical strain on the cord.

Methods: Eighty-four DCM patients underwent MRI/clinical assessments and were classified as MRI+ [T2-weighted (T2w) hyperintense lesion in MRI] or MRI− (no T2w-hyperintense lesion). Cord motion (displacement assessed by phase-contrast MRI) and spinal stenosis [adapted spinal canal occupation ratio (aSCOR)] were related to neurological (sensory/motor) and neurophysiological readouts [contact heat evoked potentials (CHEPs)] by receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis.

Results: MRI+ patients (N = 31; 36.9%) were more impaired compared to MRI− patients (N = 53; 63.1%) based on the modified Japanese Orthopedic Association (mJOA) subscores for upper {MRI+ [median (Interquartile range)]: 4 (4–5); MRI−: 5 (5–5); p < 0.01} and lower extremity [MRI+: 6 (6–7); MRI−: 7 (6–7); p = 0.03] motor dysfunction and the monofilament score [MRI+: 21 (18–23); MRI−: 24 (22-24); p < 0.01]. Both patient groups showed similar extent of cord motion and stenosis. Only in the MRI− group displacement identified patients with pathologic assessments [trunk/lower extremity pin prick score (T/LEPP): AUC = 0.67, p = 0.03; CHEPs: AUC = 0.73, p = 0.01]. Cord motion thresholds: T/LEPP: 1.67 mm (sensitivity 84.6%, specificity 52.5%); CHEPs: 1.96 mm (sensitivity 83.3%, specificity 65.6%). The aSCOR failed to show any relation to the clinical assessments.

Discussion: These findings affirm cord motion measurements as a promising additional biomarker to improve the clinical workup and to enable timely surgical treatment particularly in MRI− DCM patients.

Item Type: Article
Subjects: Institute Archives > Multidisciplinary
Depositing User: Managing Editor
Date Deposited: 24 Jun 2024 06:58
Last Modified: 24 Jun 2024 06:58
URI: http://eprint.subtopublish.com/id/eprint/4363

Actions (login required)

View Item
View Item